Country Position  on WTO issues

 CUTS>ADVOCACY>CUTS Contribution> Country Position  on WTO issues
Home
About CUTS
CITEE
CART
CHD
C-SPAC
CUTS-ARC
Contact CUTS
spacer  

CUTS Initiatives

Agenda for India on International Trade Policy
CUTS Submission at the 9th Meeting of Advisory Committee on International Trade, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Govt. of India


CUTS’ Initiative on Agenda 21 Commitments


Agenda for India at WTO


The new Indian Competition Law in controversy


CUTS’ Contributions at the 7th Meeting of the Advisory Committee on International Trade, Ministry of Commerce, Government of India, New Delhi, 2001.06.12


NGO Representation  on Government Delegation to the Doha Ministerial Conference

Campaign on Linkages

Campaign on WTO

Periodicals

Newsletters

E-Newsletter

 

Country Positions on Different Issues in the Run Up to the WTO Doha Meet

CUTS’ Contributions at the 7th Meeting of the Advisory Committee on International Trade, Ministry of Commerce, Government of India, New Delhi, 2001.06.12

Agreement on Movement of Natural Person

Agreement on Software and Services

Country Positions on WTO Issues  

As on 2001.11.02

As on 2001.09.20 

As on 2001.06.12

Country Positions on Different Issues in the Run Up to the WTO Doha MeeT (As on 20th september 2001)

Trade and Investment Policy

Trade and Competition Policy

Trade Facilitation

Government Procurement

Trade and Environment

Trade and Labour Standards

New Round

Country Positions on Different Issues in the Run Up to the WTO Doha Meet

 Trade and Investment Policy

Background

For

Fence Sitters

Against

State-of-the-Play

A Working Group on Trade and Investment Policy was set up as per the Singapore Ministerial Declaration, 1996 and it is looking into the relationship between trade and investment

This decision was adopted after hectic lobbying by EU, and Canada before the Singapore Ministerial. India was left alone at the end of the day. Even Malaysia deserted at the last moment when they got the carrot of ITA

In spite of the parallel launch of the MAI at OECD, USA was happy to support it at the WTO

EU

Chile

Costa Rica

S. Korea

Japan

Morocco

Czech Republic

Hungary

Switzerland

Norway

Australia

Argentina

Brazil

Hong Kong

Lesotho

S. Africa

USA

 

India

Malaysia

Egypt

Pakistan

Norway

The Working Group is yet to submit its final report

There is little consensus among members on issues which are to be taken up in case negotiations start, while EU is pushing hard

Tactically, EU has proposed a plurilateral agreement, with the participation of all WTO members but without any commitment. US will likely support such a move for other trade-offs

 

 

Trade and Competition Policy  

Back

 

Background

For

Fence Sitters

Against

State-of-the-Play

A Working Group on Trade and Competition Policy was set up as per the Singapore Ministerial Declaration, 1996 and it is looking into the relationship between trade and competition. South could get in the issue of studying anti-competitive practice also

In the run up to the Singapore Ministerial meeting, the EU and Japan pushed for this issue, while USA was uninterested, due to domestic turf problems

EU

Japan

Norway

USA

Mexico

South Korea

India

Pakistan

Malaysia

The Working Group is yet to submit its final report

Like investment, tactically, EU has proposed a plurilateral agreement, with the participation of all WTO members but without any commitment. US will likely support such a move for other trade-offs

 

Background

For

Fence Sitters

Against

State-of-the-Play

The Singapore Ministerial Declaration instructed the WTO Council for Trade in Goods to start exploratory and analytical work on trade facilitation

EU

Japan

USA

Switzerland

S. Korea

 

India

The issue is at the background now, but the situation is fluid

 

 

Background

For

Fence Sitters

Against

State-of-the-Play

There is a plurilateral (WTO) agreement on government procurement

As per the Singapore Ministerial Declaration, the WTO has set a Working Group, which includes all members, on Transparency in Government Procurement

EU

USA

Canada

Switzerland

Singapore

Japan

S. Korea

Israel

Liechtenstein

Hong Kong

Argentina

Australia

Bulgaria

Czech Republic

Chile

Colombia

Turkey

Jordan

Poland

Panama

India

Pakistan

Egypt

Malaysia  

A potentially contentious area

Likely to be a part of the negotiating agenda in case new round starts

 

Background

For

Fence Sitters

Against

State-of-the-Play

The WTO Committee on Trade and Environment (CTE), established at Marrakesh, is discussing a 10-point agenda

Northern civil society a strong advocate ever since.

EU

USA

Canada

Japan

Norway

Switzerland

Australia

S. Korea

Many developing countries

Discussions at the CTE are not progressing but EU continues pushing as in the past to incorporate environment in all accords

 

Background

For

Fence Sitters

Against

State-of-the-Play

Ever since the first Ministerial meeting, some developed countries have pushed for a working party on trade and labour standards at the WTO, but that did not materialise due to opposition from others, but the issue has not yet died

Many trade unions in both North and South, while mainly Northern NGOs, are big lobbies

USA

Canada

Norway Sweden*

Germany*

(* EU members, but are pressing hard within)

EU

Argentina

India

Pakistan

Egypt

S. Korea

Thailand

S. Africa

Brazil

Hong Kong

Malaysia

There has been some softening of the stance of many of those countries who were pushing hard earlier

 

 

Background

For

Fence Sitters

Against

State-of-the-Play

Some countries want to launch a new round of multilateral trade negotiations during the fourth Ministerial Conference of the WTO to be held at Doha, Qatar in November 2001, while many others are opposing

The issue, in the form of a ‘millennium round’ came up during the third Ministerial meeting of the WTO, held at Seattle, USA in 1999, but there was no progress

Another proposal mooted by the UK for a ‘development round’ which highlighted India’s concerns over anti-dumping for instance

EU

USA

Canada

Egypt

S. Africa

Japan

Costa Rica

Singapore

Hong Kong

Bangladesh  

Thailand

China (a non-member)

 

 

APEC

Mexico

New Zealand

ASEAN

LDCs (but consensus lacking)

India

Pakistan

Mauritius

Kenya

Zambia

Botswana

Mauritania  

Malaysia

The situation is fluid with changing country positions

The EU is pushing hard, including consensus building, for a ‘comprehensive round’ while the US is for a ‘limited round’

E. &O.E.

2001.09.20

 Change in shade indicates shifting position of a country from previous stand to latest one, on various issues at WTO. 

Country Positions on WTO Issues

As on 2001.11.02 

As on 2001.09.20

As on 2001.06.12

Contact CUTs

CONSUMER UNITY & TRUST SOCIETY

D–217,  Bhaskar Marg,  Bani  Park, 

Jaipur  302 016,  India,

Ph: +91(0)141-228 2821-3

Fx: +91(0)141-228 2485  

Email: cuts@sancharnet.in, cuts@cuts.org  

 

 

Top

Copyright 2005, Consumer Unity & Trust Society (CUTS), All rights reserved.
D-217, Bhaskar Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur 302 016, India
Ph: 91.141.2282821, Fax: 91.141.2282485

 

Hosted by: www.fullestop.com