You are here:
Home >
Press Release >
Who is going to
be the spoilsport, if at all...........
Who is going to be the spoilsport, if at all
Bali, December 04, 2013
|
Archive
|
|
“Blaming India is the flavour of
the week, but is that right”, said Pradeep S Mehta,
Secretary General of CUTS International and Member of the
WTO’s High Level Panel on the Future of Trade here today on
the second day of the 9th WTO Ministerial, while speaking to
the press here today.
“India is being made a
scapegoat, like it happened in July 2008 when the Doha Talks
fell apart. It was the discomfort of the US to deal with
their cotton subsidies which had been affecting four poor
countries of West Africa. Today, the USA has lost appetite
for the multilateral trading system by negotiating two mega
preferential trade agreements (TPP and TTIP), which would
align all their trading partners to their own standards”,
said Mehta.
The issue of food subsidies is
sensitive for the developing world’s poor farmers, and hence
the G-33 proposal was to protect them by seeking a carve-out
in the WTO farm agreement. The proposal was spearheaded by
Indonesia and India, but the carve-out (peace clause for
four years) sought was more to get an insurance against
their producer subsidies, which could likely breach the
allowable limits of 10 per cent.
The paradox is that the farm
accord as wrought in the Uruguay Round Agreements (URA) has
enforceable special and differential treatment (peace
clause, forever) for the rich countries which will not allow
others to challenge their own dirty subsidies.. These amount
to nearly two dollars a day for every cow in the rich world,
while nearly three billion poor in the developing world are
not even getting enough to survive.
The Doha Development Round
itself was designed to inter alia getting rid of the farm
subsidies in the west, which has created havoc in many
developing countries. That’s the main cause of the failure
of the Doha Round, and why the poor countries continue to
seek the elusive ‘development’ outcomes by correcting the
bad URA outcomes.
The Bali Ministerial hopes to
salvage the Doha Round to some extent through the three
deals on food security, trade facilitation and poor
countries development concerns. The next three days are
crucial. If there is no deal in Bali, it would become
another nail in the uncapped coffin of the Doha Round.
For more information, please contact:
Pradeep S Mehta,
psm@cuts.org, +62-82144352083
|
|
|
|
See Also
Media Room
Challenges and impacts of unfair trade practices in ASEAN
Voice of Vietnam, March 11, 2011
Need to correct a historic blunder
Deccan Herald, March 09, 2011
Government seeks for help from stakeholders in the
competition act enforcement
Muvi TV, March 07, 2011
"Diplomats need to step in to attract investment and
capital”
The Hindu, March 01, 2011
Learning from the onion crisis
The Financial Express, India, February 17, 2011
Mopani’s tax issues provoke debate
The Post Online, February 13, 2011
Events
Conference on Reviewing the Global Experience with Economic
Regulation
April 18-20, 2011,
New Delhi,
India
Agenda
|
CALL FOR PAPERS
(
Last Date of Submission January 31, 2011)
Public Event to Observe World Consumer Rights Day (WCRD)
2011
March 16, 2011, Jaipur,
India
Gathering Evidence on Unfair Trade Practices in ASEAN:
Challenges & Impacts
March 11, 2011, Hanoi, Vietnam
FEATS Second Geneva
International Conference
February 21, 2011, Geneva, Switzerland
Archive |