Webmail   Sitemap   Contact Us

WWW This Site

 

You are here: Home > Press Release > Who is going to be the spoilsport, if at all...........
 

Who is going to be the spoilsport, if at all
Bali, December 04, 2013
                                                                              

Archive


“Blaming India is the flavour of the week, but is that right”, said Pradeep S Mehta, Secretary General of CUTS International and Member of the WTO’s High Level Panel on the Future of Trade here today on the second day of the 9th WTO Ministerial, while speaking to the press here today.

“India is being made a scapegoat, like it happened in July 2008 when the Doha Talks fell apart. It was the discomfort of the US to deal with their cotton subsidies which had been affecting four poor countries of West Africa. Today, the USA has lost appetite for the multilateral trading system by negotiating two mega preferential trade agreements (TPP and TTIP), which would align all their trading partners to their own standards”, said Mehta.

The issue of food subsidies is sensitive for the developing world’s poor farmers, and hence the G-33 proposal was to protect them by seeking a carve-out in the WTO farm agreement. The proposal was spearheaded by Indonesia and India, but the carve-out (peace clause for four years) sought was more to get an insurance against their producer subsidies, which could likely breach the allowable limits of 10 per cent.

The paradox is that the farm accord as wrought in the Uruguay Round Agreements (URA) has enforceable special and differential treatment (peace clause, forever) for the rich countries which will not allow others to challenge their own dirty subsidies.. These amount to nearly two dollars a day for every cow in the rich world, while nearly three billion poor in the developing world are not even getting enough to survive.

The Doha Development Round itself was designed to inter alia getting rid of the farm subsidies in the west, which has created havoc in many developing countries. That’s the main cause of the failure of the Doha Round, and why the poor countries continue to seek the elusive ‘development’ outcomes by correcting the bad URA outcomes.

The Bali Ministerial hopes to salvage the Doha Round to some extent through the three deals on food security, trade facilitation and poor countries development concerns. The next three days are crucial. If there is no deal in Bali, it would become another nail in the uncapped coffin of the Doha Round.

For more information, please contact:
Pradeep S Mehta, psm@cuts.org, +62-82144352083

See Also

Media Room

Challenges and impacts of unfair trade practices in ASEAN
Voice of Vietnam, March 11, 2011

Need to correct a historic blunder
Deccan Herald, March 09, 2011

Government seeks for help from stakeholders in the competition act enforcement
Muvi TV, March 07, 2011

"Diplomats need to step in to attract investment and capital”
The Hindu, March 01, 2011

Learning from the onion crisis
The Financial Express, India, February 17, 2011

Mopani’s tax issues provoke debate
The Post Online, February 13, 2011

Events

Conference on Reviewing the Global Experience with  Economic Regulation
April 18-20, 2011, New Delhi, India
Agenda
| CALL FOR PAPERS ( Last Date of Submission January 31, 2011)

Public Event to Observe World Consumer Rights Day (WCRD) 2011
March 16, 2011, Jaipur, India

Gathering Evidence on Unfair Trade Practices in ASEAN: Challenges & Impacts
March 11, 2011, Hanoi, Vietnam

FEATS Second Geneva International Conference
February 21, 2011, Geneva, Switzerland

Archive

Consumer Unity & Trust Society (CUTS)
D–217, Bhaskar Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur 302016, Rajasthan, India
Ph: +91 141 2282821, Fax: +91 141 2282485, Email: cuts@cuts.org